SudoFocus OS · Rights evidence
Visual provenance and licence evidence
First video released 24 November 2025 · Contact: sudofocus@gmail.com.
Provenance evidence
SudoFocus uses AI-assisted artwork and animation. Its private production records connect each generated visual to the provider, model or generation mode when returned, provider job or request identifier, generation request, approved source image, output file hash and review decision. A motion loop is linked to the exact approved source-image version used to create it.
Uploaded, commissioned or third-party source material is recorded separately with its source and permission basis. A music ownership statement is not accepted as visual provenance.
Licence evidence
Visual provenance shows where an asset came from; it does not by itself prove permission to publish it. The licence basis for each visual must match the provider plan and terms in force when that asset was generated, together with permission for every uploaded or referenced input. Where Krea is the provider, the applicable evidence includes the generation receipt and the relevant Krea terms. Krea's current business terms describe output usage rights subject to the plan and those terms, while also noting that AI outputs may not be unique or copyright-protected in every jurisdiction.
A general provider policy is not treated as a release-specific licence certificate. Before publication, SudoFocus must be able to match the visual to its receipt, generation date, applicable plan or licence basis and input permissions. This page does not claim exclusive copyright in AI-generated material.
Release evidence
The visual record for a release identifies:
- the visual provider, model or mode, and provider job or receipt identifier;
- the approved source-image identifier or hash and final visual output hash;
- the provider terms, plan or other licence basis and verification date;
- permission for uploaded, commissioned or third-party inputs; and
- the synthetic-media disclosure and operator's review decision.
Missing visual licence evidence remains a visual-rights issue. It is not satisfied by audio ownership.